Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Every artist, on some level, loves fanfare.  Who doesn't?  But most artists resist criticism.  I've been guilty of it in the past myself.  But for the most part, after I suck up my pride, I use it.

Any time you put your work out there [ in a comic book or on the web or in a gallery ], you're up for criticism.  Sometimes the critiques aren't necessarily valid.  They're coming from fans or, in a lot of cases, keyboard warriors that just want to be negative for the sake of being negative.  But in almost all cases, there's something to be learned by criticism. 

My wife is a perfect example.  She's not an artist, which is my usual go to excuse when debating the merits of those that might offer critiques of my work that I disagree with.  My wife, can't draw.  But she knows when a nose is off.  Or if the lighting looks "weird".  Or if an arm doesn't look right.  Or if a drawing is just sorta dead.  She has a good eye.  Maybe she can't articulate it in a way that offers me a solution but she does a good job of letting me know if a drawing of mine is on the money or could use some change.  The criticism is never fun to hear.  Never.  But the moment I get over myself and take a fresh look at what was critiqued - I find the change is always a drastic improvement on the work itself. 

That's not to say that any drawing that gets critiqued becomes perfect - but you will start adjusting your focus to that specific problem.  It helps.  Fresh eyes always help. 

So what if you're trail blazing?  You're Picaso?  You're trying to do things artistically that no one has ever done before?  How can criticism be constructive then?  Well, it's always constructive in one sense or another.  Even the casual fan can pick up on aesthetics.  People instinctively relate to attractive things.  Granted some find morbid or ugly attractive.  But morbid can be attractive.  Everything can be if it's approached well.  My point is, people, more often than not, can spot what's appealing.  They can appreciate quality.  So if you're trying something new and inventive and it's awesome - people are gonna go wow!  But if you're trying what you think is new and awesome and you're not getting the reaction you want - you may need to make some adjustments.  Maybe minor or maybe major.  But you won't know if you don't seek out solid advice and criticism. 

In my case, I'm lucky enough to have a very critical but incredibly talented set of friends.  My biggest critic is :icondevilpig: Dave Johnson.  A lot of times I'm terrified to send art his way.  He doesn't pull punches.  But his critiques are genuine and he wants me to be the best I can be. 

Find someone or a group of someones that you can get some solid feedback from.  Otherwise, you'll find improvement to be a very slow ride.  And that ride could come to a full stop.  Everyone has seen what happens to colleagues [ or celebrities ] that rise to the top of any field, art, music or other entertainment and stop listening to criticism and only allow "Yes-men" to sound off their praises.  They lose touch.  They lose their fire.  They lose the edge that got them noticed in the first place.  They stop growing.

Give yourself every opportunity to succeed.  Suck up your pride and ask for feedback.  It may hurt now but once those wounds heal up - you'll be stronger than ever. 

Cheers.
Almost.  Here's the thing: I have a weird relationship with commissions.  I take them very personally.  Why, you ask?  Because unlike my comic book work - it's a an individual and not a company that is purchasing them.  That kinda changes things for me. 

Anyway, I'm taking only a few commissions.  First come, first served.  Contact Jason at Jason@essentialsequential.com or visit www.essentialsequential.com/Da… for subject requests and pricing. 

Cheers Barbarians! 

Star Wars by urban-barbarianSamurai Wolverine by urban-barbarianLuke Cage Samurai by urban-barbarianBlues Brothers! by urban-barbarian

Post Script- The "Star Wars" Dressing was done in Photoshop.  The actual commission is just the figures of Han Solo and Chewbacca.  Although, hand-lettering can be worked in.
:icondevilpig: along with Josh Barnett, pranked me on the TV show, Overhaulin'.  This could be some great TV OR... it could be a horrible disaster for me...  It's on the Velocity Network, check your local listings for the broadcast time. 

gulp!
I'll be in Artist's Alley, booth #Q18 drawing $40.00 head/bust ink sketches!  Only a few per day, hope to meet a few of you there!  Have fun everyone!  Follow me on Twitter for updates!

Check out some awesome animation from :icondevilpig:

It's for MTV's new Liquid Television! 
If you're an artist of any kind it's extremely important to hone your craft and technical abilities.  After all, the better you draw and the better you are at mastering the drawing tools you use - the easier it is to convey your unique message for public consumption. 

But how important is technical ability, really?  Obviously, it's very important.  Understanding anatomy, light and shadow and perspective are key to solid drawing.  It's important to always be improving in those departments.  It's also very important to master the tools you use to draw with. Learning to render or color professionally can only increase your appeal to both fans and other professionals. 

But what about developing artistic appeal on a much deeper level? 

It's not just about finding a pleasing style.  Anyone can do that with enough practice.  You can always choose a popular artist and emulate his or her style.  The blueprint is right there.  But why do artists that copy a style never reach the same heights as the artists they're copying?  I'm sure you could say that they are always one step behind in a sense.  And that's probably true.  But a technically proficient artist should be able to not only copy someone's style but even improve upon it, right?  But that's very rarely the case.

I know of so many artists that are at extremely high levels in their technical abilities but are missing one key ingredient.  The people they draw, the compositions they choose are arguably perfect.  The rendering: perfect.  The lighting: perfect.  And yet... - yawn-.... The drawings or comic book pages are boring.  But if the drawing is technically perfect, what could they have done better?

What I'm talking about is basically something called charm. 

There's a charm to a Norman Rockwell or a Leyendecker painting.  Arthur Adams draws charming people and creatures.  Neal Adams drew people that actually looked like they were saying and thinking the word balloons above their heads.  Frank Miller and Klaus Janson created a very real and gritty world full of relate-able characters.  Think about Berni Wrightson.  Walt Simonson and John Buscema's figures are just naturally powerful and strong.  Frank Frazetta is a great example of a charming artist.  Jack Davis, of Mad Magazine fame, was able to convey a great deal of humor in his work.  Animators like Chuck Jones were a breed apart when it came to charm.  It seems like certain artists exude charm and others simply do not.

So how does an artist develop charm?

I'm not going to lie to you here and tell you that for some it doesn't come naturally.  Because, I believe, that for some - it does come naturally.  Some artists naturally infuse personality into their works and you see it immediately. Others need to develop it.  The easiest way is to "let go".  Let go of the technical side of drawing for a bit and practice conveying emotion in your subjects.  You probably have developed a set way of drawing a face or a figure.  But that set way of drawing can sometimes limit your ability to convey emotion. 

Forgetting what you know and drawing from a raw place allows you to access parts of yourself on an artistic level that technically sound drawing cannot.  It's too restrictive.  There are too many rules.  If you're trying to draw someone laughing - your lines and brush strokes and even the color you choose should mirror that emotion.  You'll be surprised how much you can convey with a few "honest" lines.  The same goes for a figure in action or drawing an angry or sad face.  Take a break from drawing in your practiced style and try drawing how you feel.  At first you may not be pleased with how such a drawing may turn out.  That's natural.  If you could hit a homerun the first time you were at bat or bowl a game of 300 - THAT would be unnatural.  Everything takes practice.  Including learning how to loosen up and how to draw from a very human and emotional space.  And when I say human and emotional, I don't mean you have to get all weepy.  I'm talking about just accessing the part of you that is truly relating to whatever is beneath what you're drawing.  If it's cowboy smoking a cigarette while leaning on a wooden fence or a couple in love at a cafe - you have to put yourself there.  In their heads.  But you also have to feel what that fence feels like.  What the air feels like.  Get inside your subject's head like an actor would.  Sometimes the drawing won't be pretty but the you'll truly capture a moment.  Capturing a moment is so much more important than drawing the perfect, photo realistic, cowboy hat.  It's about feeling.  As an artist, if you want to truly deliver your message, you need to transfer that human experience.  Your experience.  Your perspective.  That's the most interesting and entertaining thing about art.  That's why art is so powerful. 

Once you practice this skill it's rather easy to apply your drawing style and rendering techniques later on.  It's like applying the body panels on an automobile frame and engine.  Without the engine, the frame and the proper suspension - it's just a pretty car.  With all the ingredients in place, the proper foundation, the car is more than just stylistically attractive.  It's the full package.  Beauty and performance.  A masterpiece.  Perhaps I'm getting carried away.  But that's actually a good thing, right? 

Cheers. 
For me it's all about drumming up feelings.  Those feelings I got when I first discovered comic books and comic book magazines like Savage Sword of Conan, Eerie and other Warren publications.  It was a strange, mysterious black and white world.  I didn't know what was next.  It's hard to explain.  I would turn the page and discover a new style, a new way of looking at drawing.  As much as I loved the House Styles of Marvel and DC Comics - I also fell in love with the work of those famous late 60's, 70's and early 80's illustrators that weren't doing superhero comics. 

So when I'm drawing, I'm trying to recreate that experience for myself.  Most of that comes down to my inking.  I study a lot of exceptional artists like Williamson, Frazetta, Klaus Janson, Jorge Zaffino, Alex Nino and Toppi. I love that old skool look. I love evidence of the inking tools like the brush and the pen nib.  I don't want my work to look like "a computer drew it" - which is what artists sometimes hear every now and again.  If it's too clean, it lacks humanity, poetry and playfulness.  Where is the mystery if you know or can guess how an artist will handle the lines and tones that create a particular form?  An arm, a face, a rock or a tree?

In my early days I wanted desperately to display a precise and clean line.  Ultimately, I believe that because of the practice and precision of goals like that I developed solid control of most inking tools.  Brushes, pen nibs and rapidiographs.  But when I left the comic book field and pursued design and advertising - I relied less and less on the finished look I crafted for superhero comics.  I found myself drawing more and more like the artistic heroes I had as, basically, a child.  I liked John Buscema's Conan.  I liked it when he inked himself or when Tony DeZuniga did finishes on him.  Bold lines and plenty of Zip-a-Tone.  I also poured through the Ballantine Frazetta books and studied his work endlessly.  That lead me to Al Williamson.  I was introduced to Alex Nino later on [ before I was even a teenager ].  Later I was shown Toppi and my father introduced me to the advertising illustration of Bob Peak.  As a fan of Klaus Janson I was naturally a fan of Jorge Zaffino's powerful and dramatic inking style.  Reckless, strong and uncompromising. 

So, years later, when I returned to comic books I struggled.  My first attempts looked like cousins of my earlier work.  I was very dissatisfied.  I quickly discovered that I could draw in the style I developed outside of the comic book world and it wouldn't be disregarded.  Instead, I was nudged to go further by artists I respected like Dave Johnson.  Today I'm still trying to narrow down a specific look.  But I never want my work to be mistaken by anyone that maybe a computer program was used.  My goal is to reawaken the fan in me.  I hope to keep things interesting so that anyone reading the comics I draw looks and wonders a bit. 

Blah, blah, blah.  Ramblings of a never satisfied artist.   
Urban Barbarian Font! by urban-barbarian

Yup.  I got Font'd!  By Richard Starkings and John Roshell of Comic Craft no less!  I've always been a fan of the art of lettering.  It's one of the things that I loved about Walt Simonson and Howard Chaykin's work.  They always worked closely with their letterer to give their comic books unique looks. 

So when I got the opportunity to illustrate the John Tiffany book I wanted to make sure the lettering reflected the mood of the story properly.  Comic Craft stepped in and developed a font based on my mad scribblings!  The first one, "Dan Panosian" I used a classic ink pen and for the "Urban Barbarian" I used a brush.  They took the samples and designed and awesome pair of fonts!  Check it out here on their website! and specifically at this link to purchase it!

You can also pick up the French version of John Tiffany on Amazon France!
I liken the comic book making business to the life of a donut.

Allow me to explain.

Unless you're a baker, I doubt you're going to make a good donut your first time out. I mean it sounds simple enough. A donut. But it's not. When was the last time your mother made you a donut? "I know, I'll bake some donuts and bring them to the party...!" Not a lot of people can make donuts, or good ones at least. So I assume it takes some practice. Some care. Just like making a decent comic book.

So you practice and train yourself and you get to a point in your donut making expertise that you decide to make one for public consumption. You gather the ingredients. You prep your kitchen. You set the oven temperature. You get your donut ducks in order. Once it's all nice and heated you want people to enjoy it -so you proudly display that tasty tire on a pretty shelf. Probably next to a bunch of other carefully crafted donuts. Finally someone buys that little fella and chews it up. Maybe they were just hungry and gobbled it down. But maybe they snapped a picture of it with their cellphone and posted your glorious creation for all the world to see. Maybe even wrote a Tweet about how delightful it was. But then they ate it.

Now the shelf is empty again.

No one remembers that donut. Few people are discussing that donut.

Creating a donut that leaves people still talking after consuming it is no easy task I imagine.

I guess that's why there are so few comic books that stand the test of time. I still talk about Frank Miller's Dark Knight and his Daredevil run, Walter Simonson's Thor run. Claremont and Byrne's X-Men. Barry Winsor Smith's Weapon X. Buscema's Conan, Neal Adam's Batman, Moore and Gibbon's Watchmen. Arthur Adams' X-Men annuals and Michael Golden's insane cover run.

Those are some tasty donuts.
I did an interview at The Real Stan Lee website!  Kinda excited about that!

Here is is:

therealstanlee.com/#dan-panosi…

Learn all sorts of lovely things about me and then use them against me when I'm weak and defenseless.
A friend of mine is producing a Sci-Fi movie and I'm on board to do a special limited edition poster for the project.  They're also putting the original up as one of the incentives! 

Check out this www.indiegogo.com/projects/hom… to see what they're talking about.
Motivation to achieve your goals in life comes in many forms.  I decided to take a look at some of mine throughout my life.  Keep reading if you care to learn my deep dark secrets [ ultimately you can use them against me later in life when I'm weak and defenseless. ]

When I was a kid I wanted to be just like my father. He passed away when I was 28 but man he left a mark!  By the time I was a teenager I was a lot to handle - so we hardly ever saw eye to eye.  He was a tough and talented man.  To me he was like a super hero.  He had a very black and white philosophy about life.  He defined right and wrong very distinctly - there was no grey in his world.  As a kid, a philosophy like that makes complete sense even if it isn't very realistic.  He was a former pro boxer turned commercial artist.  Eventually he ran his own ad agency.  He could play guitar and piano by ear and played baseball as often as he could.  He also loved comic books.  Ideally, he would tell me, he would have loved to have been a comic book artist.  

So you can imagine the sort of impression that made on me.  When I turned 14 I decided I wanted to be a comic book artist.  I had already lost some favor with my father prior to that decision.  At age 12 I lost a school yard fight and he wouldn't speak to me for a month.  It was a tough little stretch.  I decided that I would throw myself into boxing and martial arts so that would never happen again [ sadly, I've won some and lost some since then - but at least I toughened up a bit! ].  At 14, he took me to see the movie Conan the Barbarian.  My father had put me on a steady diet of Clint Eastwood, Charles Bronson and Sylvester Stallone [ he gave me the middle name: Duke, after John Wayne... ] - so Conan fit right in.  Suffice to say, the film really resonated with me.  I picked up an issue of Savage Sword of Conan [ my father loved the work of John Buscema, Neal Adams and Walt Simonson ] and my course was set!  I would be a comic book artist!  

Unfortunately, my father wasn't very keen on my artistic or professional fighting pursuits.  He felt that the life of an artist was a difficult one - and it is at times!  Boxing was too dangerous and would leave me brain damaged - I should be a doctor or a lawyer.  I figured he didn't think I had the stomach for an art career. Maybe I wasn't tough enough to deal with the criticism and long hours, etc.  

I was, however, motivated to prove to him that I could do it and earn his respect.

A few months later I submitted my work to Marvel Comics and received a very favorable response from their Submissions Editor.  He said if I stuck with it I could be hired by Marvel and sent me a lot of paperwork that explained what an average artist could expect to earn, including all the medical benefits, etc.  I couldn't believe it.  And neither could my father!  After that, he changed his tune regarding my art career.  He had only given me one art lesson as a kid: How to use a stick figure and apply box like shapes to it in order create a human body that loosely resembled a robot.  After that I was on my own.  That letter changed my life in many ways.  My study books were filled with drawings.  So were my notebooks.  And my bedroom.  I started a business drawing custom RPG [ role play games - like Dungeons and Dragons ] characters for enthusiasts.  I ran an ad in Dragon Magazine with money I made from mowing lawns around my neighborhood.  Before I had my Driver's License I had already bought a car with what I had earned.  It also kept me practicing.  Every day I would come home from school and draw someone's character.  It taught me discipline and how to run a business.    

When I moved to NYC during my early Marvel, DC and Valiant career I had somewhat of a mentor.  I also considered him a good friend at one point in my life.  He was older than me and opened my eyes to the art and comic book world in ways I hadn't explored or even fathomed.  I'm eternally grateful for the experience and the friendship.  He was leaps and bounds ahead of me and I listened to every word he said.   Like all of us, my mentor wasn't without his flaws.  Sadly, one thing he was keen on doing was telling me that I would never be as good as he was.  And also, that I was, at best, an illustrator and not an artist.  He made a distinction.  To be fair, there is a difference.  That really stuck with me.  From that point on I was motivated to prove him wrong.  I'm not sure that I have but it's certainly something that compelled me forward in my artistic pursuit.  

I'll use a sports analogy [ I seem to be fond of them ]: It's rare that an athlete is born and not created.  In the sense that most athletes mature into the players they are by virtue of practicing and testing their skills on and off the court or in the ring. The only way you can improve your Free Throw in basketball is to throw Free Throws.  Lots of them.  It's almost impossible, even without coaching, to not get better at throwing Free Throws if you continually practice.  The same is true for artists.  Learning all you can, varying your study and asking questions are all paramount to improving your artistic skills.  More importantly though, is applying the knowledge you're picking up.  Literally practicing what, inside your head, you know.  Understanding the mechanics of solid drawing is one thing, applying those mechanics is another.  

So, I did everything in my power to improve my art game and prove my mentor pal wrong.  It's a never ending struggle/quest and it's one that I never tire of.  Practice can't make perfect.  That's a myth.  There is no perfect drawing.  Ask your favorite artist what they would change about one your favorite pieces of art drawn by him/her and they'll tell you exactly what's wrong with it and what they would do to improve it.  But practice does make progress.  I'm very happy with the progress I've made since my first issue of Prophet over 20 years ago but I'm hardly satisfied with where I'm at artistically.  That's a good thing.  There's still room for growth and because I'm still learning - I will continue to hone my craft.  

So early on in my art career I was motivated by my love of comic books and my father's admiration.  Later I was motivated by revenge in a strange sense.  What drives me now is the result of my pursuit to learn and grow artistically.  Today my motivation is a healthy passion and it has changed the way I look at everything around me.  When you're motivated for pure reasons there's a certain amount of joy you experience that's unlike any other kind.  If you're following an artistic path, motivation can come from many areas in your life - but when you do it for yourself the journey is the most fulfilling.  I guess that just makes sense, doesn't it?  Funny how it took me so many years to figure that out...  For good or ill, all my trials and errors will most likely be presented on Deviant Art for all the world to see!  Gulp!  Scary stuff!

Motivation and desire for change will create improvements.  Your passion for what you do, whether it's art, photography, writing, music or sports will take you places you never dreamed possible.  Your passion, if properly explored and respected, can change your life.
  • Listening to: sirens and honking
  • Reading: and often weeping
  • Watching: UFC
  • Eating: selectively
  • Drinking: see above
From time to time I'll hear questions from other artists concerning artistic pathways.  

It probably stems from seeing my work over the years.  Early in my career I was given a tremendous opportunity to draw the first Prophet book for Image Comics.  I had years of inking experience behind me but I had never drawn a full comic book prior to that experience.  The first issue sold nearly a half million copies.  My first foray into penciling/inking was quite a spectacle...  Looking back, it's one of the most cringe-worthy books from the 90's.  That was a little over 20 years ago.  When I returned to the comic book field I was a different artist thankfully.  Obviously 20 years is a long time for a growth curve.

Check out some of my Journals here on DA. I delve into getting into the business and what pushed me, etc. Mostly it's just focusing on weaknesses and addressing them. Fixing what's broke or doesn't perform as well as I feel it should. Which, is of course, a never ending quest.

Drawing from life [ Life Drawing ] changed the game for me quite a bit.

The things I learned from attempting to capture live subjects and integrating what I learned into other forms of illustration, for me, was key. Too many artists kid themselves into thinking that their style will change into something similar to what you see from traditional Life Drawing artists. A charcoal, tonal illustrative style that lacks the punch and exaggeration one finds in comic book and video game art. It simply isn't the case.

It's a lot like Cross Training.  All the top athletes cross train.  If you're a Mixed Martial Artist fighting in the UFC like George St Pierre, you'll notice he trains with the Canadian Olympic gymnasts.  You wouldn't say he fights like a gymnast would you?  But it's common for a comic book artist or animation artist to shrug off Life Drawing because they don't think what they'll gain from the exercise can apply to their particular craft.  Also, all too often, no one likes to look bad trying something new...

What Artistic Cross Training does is drastically improve the way you see both organic and inorganic objects.  The way light and shadow truly affects a surface.  Light and shadow, after all, are what outlines and line work are trying to capture.  If your concept of how light and shadow and lines work is learned only from what you've seen from other artists and what you've been taught from studying art instruction books - you are severely handicapping yourself.  That's not to say that there aren't great artists out there that haven't learned how to draw that way exclusively.  But it begs the question of how much their art would improve if they did!  In some cases it's hard to imagine.

The lessons from interpreting forms from Life Drawing can easily be applied to every art style.  Particularly cartooning.  The best cartoonists and animation artists readily study life!  The best studios would even bring in live animals to draw from.  You can't develop into a top artist from just connecting tubes and blocks to create shapes.  You're best served by understanding how those elements work in concert together to create movement and expression.

Okay, enough of that.  The other question I get quite a bit is what tools I use to ink with.

When I first started inking at Marvel and DC Comics a new wave of inking/finishing and even drawing was sweeping the industry.  At first they called it the X-Office style [ due to the almost exclusive look the X-Men books were employing ] and then, later, the Image Style.  At first, very few inkers/finishers took to the style that was started by Jim Lee, Whilce Portacio and Scott Williams.  Scott really pioneered an inking trend that dominated the market for nearly 20 years and still affects the level of detail you see in a great deal of comic books today.  So, like I said, at first - no one had seen anything quite like it [ it was a combination of Gil Kane mixed with Klaus Janson and some Barry Winsor Smith ].  Because I studied Portacio and Williams' Legion of the Night pages religiously in the Marvel offices - I was given the last issue of the series to ink [ and even finish ] when both Whilce and Scott were concentrating exclusively on illustrating X-Factor and Uncanny X-Men.  

Studying an artistic style and actually attempting it are two different things.  But I gave it my best shot.  The results weren't so hot but the only other inker giving that inking style a shot besides Williams was Art Thibert at DC Comics.  So, if you couldn't get Scott Williams to ink your book, it was left to Art Thibert or myself.  Very quickly I was moved to the X-Office and so was Art [ he was kicking ass doing finishes on Dan Jurgen's Superman book at DC ].  All of sudden almost every inker was being asked to ink in the X-Office style.  Well, there had to be a secret to it.  There had to be a trick employed to capture that look.  

Perhaps it was as easy as using the proper crowquill nib or brush...

One day, a veteran inker cornered me in the Marvel Bullpen.  I was 21 years old at the time and I grew up reading the comic books this man had worked on.  He wanted to know what the "Magic Nib" was.  That's what he referred to it as.  It had to be the pen nib that was delivering this new style of inking, in his opinion.  It turned out we were using the exact same nib.  A Hunt 102.  Almost every inker at the time used that nib.  

If you're a basketball player, you obviously need good athletic shoes.  Probably some with ankle support, right?  But it's really the way you play the game that makes all the difference.  It's the same with drawing.  You don't see the best artists turning in work done with Crayola Crayons but... A truly good artist, with only crayons at his/her disposal will still blow away an average artist who's using an array of the finest tools.  Just like a bare-foot NBA basketball player could easily out play a top high school basketball player!

It really doesn't matter what you ink with so long as you understand what you're inking and what the lines you're throwing down mean.  For the longest time I didn't.  Shading lines, outlines, hatching - they were all lines.  Lines that I wanted to look exactly like Scott Williams' lines.  Or Terry Austin's lines or Klaus Janson's lines or Jorge Zaffino's lines.  But until you truly understand what those lines represent - they're just lines.  That's why, for me, it all comes back to life drawing.  Life drawing teaches you what those lines represent.  

I worked briefly for comic book legend, Neal Adams.  Evey morning I would get to his Times Square ad agency in NYC at the crack of dawn.  No one else would be there but Neal and I.  Graciously, he would sit down with me and show me how he fixed all the pages I was working on the day before.  He didn't have to do that but I'll never forget his patience and generosity.  To this day I still recall the lessons I learned from him.  Not all of it sunk in back then - but every now and then I'll draw something and think to myself, "OH! That's what he meant by that!"

One of the most important things he taught me was that the drawing tool wasn't important.  I had just started inking with a brush because I was also working for Marvel.  I had noticed that ALL the pages were inked using traditional India Ink!  I was used to using markers!  I thought, "There's no way I can turn in marker pages!  They'll see I'm a fraud and never hire me again!".  Yet Neal insisted that you could use whatever tool necessary to achieve the final look.  All that mattered was how the book printed.  He used simple Pentel Markers.  I was shocked.  He had used brushes, nibs and Rapidiographs in the past but settled on markers.  It didn't matter.  He was doing things with those markers that I couldn't dream of!  So, for the work I did for Continuity Graphics [ Neal's company ] I used markers and for Marvel, DC and Valiant - I used a brush and crowquill.  

These days I use brush markers.  I use the Kuretake PK10-2 and the Pentel Pocket Re-fillable Brush Pen.  About two years ago I used the pen used by John Byrne, The Staedtler Mars Graphic 3000 Duo and Microns.  But tomorrow, if something comes out that's different I might try it.  The tool isn't really important.  You can get a precise line with almost any pen or brush.  There's little differences, sure - but it's really what you can do with that implement that's important.  It's the number of times you've thrown that Free Throw all alone that makes the difference when it's game time on the court.  Not the shoes.  

You can check out Scott William's amazing work by clicking on this inkist.deviantart.com/ and Art Thibert's incredible work at this aethibert.deviantart.com/ .  And Neal Adam's work by clicking this www.nealadams.com/
  • Listening to: sirens and honking
  • Reading: and often weeping
  • Watching: UFC
  • Eating: selectively
  • Drinking: see above
Check out this www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGjGhU… and prepare yourself to be amazed and [even] astounded!  Kim Jung is a crazy creative machine!  

Some very humbling but inspiring stuff!  Enjoy!
  • Listening to: sirens and honking
  • Reading: and often weeping
  • Watching: UFC
  • Eating: selectively
  • Drinking: see above
The website is up and ready!  If you have a stylish cat that demands all the best things in life - then I have a litter box for you.  Or more like a friend of mine does!  Cinematographer Robert Brinkman came up with the concept and I designed it!  Check out this iovo-designs.myshopify.com/ for more info and ordering!




Photobucket
  • Listening to: sirens and honking
  • Reading: and often weeping
  • Watching: UFC
  • Eating: selectively
  • Drinking: see above
Nice journal title but what it should really have said was: Interviews with me.

We discuss art [ naturally! ] and influences and technique in both of them.  Yet, amazingly, each interview is kinda different.  How is that possible? Probably because I'm a bit of a scatterbrain.

There are two interviews.  One, compliments of Deviant Art and :iconshyree:  It can be found at this www.facebook.com/notes/deviant…

AND this one by David Harper for Multiversity Comics.  Check out this multiversitycomics.com/intervi…

There's also a cool interview with :iconseangordonmurphy: by the same site! Check it out at this multiversitycomics.com/intervi…

Why so many interviews?  I can't say.  That would be a question for another interview and this is simply a journal entry.
  • Listening to: sirens and honking
  • Reading: and often weeping
  • Watching: UFC
  • Eating: selectively
  • Drinking: see above
Hey Barbarians,

I'm a part of a new blog that features the talents of :icondevilpig: :iconmarkchidc: :iconandrew-robinson: :iconericcanete: :iconbeckycloonan: :iconrafaelalbuquerqueart: Duncan Fergredo, Bill Sienkievwicz, Sean Phillips, Cliff Chiang, Amanda Conner, Francesco Francavilla, Phil Noto and Jock!

What Not Blog Spot is basically a diverse comic book related talent source attacking a very wide variety of themes each week.  Should be a lot of fun!  Take a look!

You may wanna check out our whatnotisms.blogspot.com/ from time to time and see what's going on.  

I'm still a part of the mightiness that is Comic Twart too.  Check out this www.comictwart.com/ to see the latest comic book and animation themes being attacked by the Twartists!
  • Listening to: sirens and honking
  • Reading: and often weeping
  • Watching: UFC
  • Eating: selectively
  • Drinking: see above

DRAW! Magazine Cover Feature!

Tue Sep 6, 2011, 8:51 AM
Hey Barbarians - check out this twomorrows.com/index.php?main_…

I'm featured on the cover of Draw Magazine and I'm interviewed by Mike Manley!  There's a few pages of the interview to preview using the link above, if you wanna check it out!

Please share the twomorrows.com/index.php?main_… if you're so inclined, as well!  

Anyway, I just wanted to announce it!  I'm very honored to be a part of such a cool magazine!  Thanks!

  • Mood: Llama
  • Listening to: sirens and honking
  • Reading: Robert E Howard
  • Watching: UFC
  • Eating: selectively
  • Drinking: see above
My last Journal was a compilation of some varied ideas regarding Creator Owned comic book properties. Some discussion of what Marvel and DC represent to writers and artists. My random thoughts regarding Diamond Distributors and some ideas I thought Image Comics might want to consider.

Since I hit the Publish Button I've received a lot of interesting feedback and there's been a lot Internet talk on the subject. The most interesting feedback so far was directly from the Publisher of Image Comics, Eric Stephenson. I guess he might have some insight, right? I thought so too! Eric and I have known each other since the very, very early days of Image Comics when he was writing and editing and he's always been very helpful over the years. I was surprised that he stumbled across my journal and thrilled that he took the time to address what I brought up. He's good that way. After emailing, we thought it would be nice to make our discussion regarding these loose topics available to creators and fans alike.

ERIC: After reading your thoughts on Image's position with publishing I wanted to clear some misconceptions up. I'm all for ideas about how to increase the awareness of our material. I think there's some big problems across the board in comics and one we all need to tackle. But making erroneous statements about what we do here doesn't help matters, because a lot of people are already walking around spreading a bunch of half-truths where Image is concerned.

You wrote: "For one thing, not everyone that is creating their own comic book is a Jim Lee, Todd McFarlane or [ insert comic book creator with a built in fan base ]. Image comics offers all their creators the same privileges. That privilege includes ONE page in Previews."

In most cases, if a book is starting out, its first issue gets more than one page in Previews. I've got the Previews for titles shipping in April 2011 in front of me right now, so let's just look at that as an example:


Super Dinosaur #1 has four pages
Blue Estate #1 has two pages
Green Wake #1 has two pages
Undying Love #1 has two pages
'68 #1 has two pages
Nonplayer #1 has two pages
Zero: JM Ken Niimura Illustrations TP has two pages


Obviously, we can't give every single title multiple pages on a regular basis, but we've actually been giving launch books a couple pages to show off interior art for years now.

You also wrote: "Image pays for that or has a deal with Diamond [ Diamond is the biggest means of distribution in the comic book marketplace ] which is great - but that's it. That's the ALL the advertising you get."


Also not true. We actually do place banner ads on comics Websites like CBR and we regularly highlight titles on our own Website. We also advertise in other Diamond publications and through a weekly retailer newsletter, not to mention the Diamond Website. We also distribute preview copies of books (these days, more and more, we're doing this digitally, using ISSUU) to retailers and reviewers. We send review copies out. We frequently do posters for books that are sent to retailers. Whether those posters are put up is entirely dependent on the retailers in question, but we have done and continue to do these when they seem like they'd help. We send out postcards for books. In the past, we've done bookmarks for various trade paperbacks and graphic novels. We also run house ads in our comics, and we frequently run previews for other titles in our comics, too. Running a preview for, say, CHEW #1 in THE WALKING DEAD certainly helped increase awareness of that book.


Most of the press you see for Image comics? We set that up. The preview art you see online? We send that out. The articles on Image and various books that have appeared in the New York Times, USA Today, etc.? We did that. Signings, panels at conventions, etc.? All of that is arranged by Image. The implication that we do nothing is a little insulting, especially coming from someone I would have thought understood the company a bit more. Given that there are a grand total of ELEVEN people working here, I think we do an admirable job – Dark Horse has over 100 employees. IDW has something like 30. Could we be better at certain things? Certainly, but we do a lot for a small staff.

DAN: That is an impressive amount of work for 11 people...! I had no idea. I didn't mean any offense by my journal - I just thought the advertising was pretty limited and the policy was different. Taking into account all the convention work and the means of solicitation - I stand corrected! Thanks Eric!

ERIC: Not at all. I love this business and all of this is very important to me. Concerning the advertising aspect, though, I'm not sure where you want any of us – Image, IDW, Dark Horse – to advertise. Entertainment Weekly? TV? That isn't cost effective for Marvel and DC, why would it be for the rest of us?

DAN: A man can dream, right? I was thinking of targeting college campuses to start with. I wouldn't imagine that would be as costly as huge magazines and national broadcast television. Maybe some authorized Image Comics Panel discussions on campus that could lead to organized clubs or the present day equivalent of what a club might be on a college campus these days? What do you think? I'm sure that's not as simple as snapping your fingers and with the limited amount of resources available, etc... But maybe mentioning that Image Comics and some of it's creators would be up for some University Tours or something...

ERIC: I think that's an interesting idea, and you're right, it's not going to be as expensive as advertising. What's more, I have to think it would be a more direct method of engaging readers. Honestly, there are probably lots of things everyone could be doing beyond merely advertising in the usual places, and it's good to hear new ideas. I was reading something online recently, it may have been Skottie Young's blog or maybe it was Tony Harris, that said there's a lot of talk about how something needs to be done to broaden our readership, but very few ideas suggested about how to actually do that, so ideas like this and some of the others you brought up in your journal are a big help.

DAN: Gotcha. So what's one of the things most new creators don't pick up on when they're starting out? Any pointers or suggestions?

ERIC: The one thing most people don't seem to get is that the most successful books at Image are the ones that come out on time, by creators who are motivated to make their books successful. For every John Layman or Robert Kirkman, there is a creator content to just turn the book in, LATE, and then wonder why things didn't work out. I've seen it time and time again. There's a book right now – the first issue came out in January, great reviews, sold out. The second issue should be out now. Tumbleweeds. Probably going to be over a month late. That doesn't help on any level, and it's the main reason creator-owned books aren't supported by many retailers: They don't believe they're going to come out on time or, in some cases, ever.

DAN: Thanks, Eric. Mind if I share this on my next Journal? I know you're super busy and you won't be able to field questions - but I think everyone would dig hearing your perspective.

ERIC: Sure thing. More than happy set the record straight on all this stuff.
Photobucket

My last Journal was a compilation of some varied ideas regarding Creator Owned comic book properties.  Some discussion of what Marvel and DC represent to writers and artists.  My random thoughts regarding Diamond Distributors and some ideas I thought Image Comics might want to consider.

Since I hit the Publish Button I've received a lot of interesting feedback and there's been a lot Internet talk on the subject.  The most interesting feedback so far was directly from the Publisher of Image Comics, Eric Stephenson.  I guess he might have some insight, right?  I thought so too!  Eric and I have known each other since the very, very early days of Image Comics when he was writing and editing and he's always been very helpful over the years.  I was surprised that he stumbled across my journal and thrilled that he took the time to address what I brought up.  He's good that way.  After emailing, we thought it would be nice to make our discussion regarding these loose topics available to creators and fans alike.

ERIC: After reading your thoughts on Image's position with publishing I wanted to clear some misconceptions up.  I'm all for ideas about how to increase the awareness of our material. I think there's some big problems across the board in comics and one we all need to tackle. But making erroneous statements about what we do here doesn't help matters, because a lot of people are already walking around spreading a bunch of half-truths where Image is concerned.

You wrote: "For one thing, not everyone that is creating their own comic book is a Jim Lee, Todd McFarlane or [ insert comic book creator with a built in fan base ]. Image comics offers all their creators the same privileges. That privilege includes ONE page in Previews."

In most cases, if a book is starting out, its first issue gets more than one page in Previews. I've got the Previews for titles shipping in April 2011 in front of me right now, so let's just look at that as an example:


Super Dinosaur #1 has four pages
Blue Estate #1 has two pages
Green Wake #1 has two pages
Undying Love #1 has two pages
'68 #1 has two pages
Nonplayer #1 has two pages
Zero: JM Ken Niimura Illustrations TP has two pages


Obviously, we can't give every single title multiple pages on a regular basis, but we've actually been giving launch books a couple pages to show off interior art for years now.

You also wrote: "Image pays for that or has a deal with Diamond [ Diamond is the biggest means of distribution in the comic book marketplace ] which is great - but that's it. That's the ALL the advertising you get."


Also not true. We actually do place banner ads on comics Websites like CBR and we regularly highlight titles on our own Website. We also advertise in other Diamond publications and through a weekly retailer newsletter, not to mention the Diamond Website. We also distribute preview copies of books (these days, more and more, we're doing this digitally, using ISSUU) to retailers and reviewers. We send review copies out. We frequently do posters for books that are sent to retailers. Whether those posters are put up is entirely dependent on the retailers in question, but we have done and continue to do these when they seem like they'd help. We send out postcards for books. In the past, we've done bookmarks for various trade paperbacks and graphic novels. We also run house ads in our comics, and we frequently run previews for other titles in our comics, too. Running a preview for, say, CHEW #1 in THE WALKING DEAD certainly helped increase awareness of that book.


Most of the press you see for Image comics? We set that up. The preview art you see online? We send that out. The articles on Image and various books that have appeared in the New York Times, USA Today, etc.? We did that. Signings, panels at conventions, etc.? All of that is arranged by Image. The implication that we do nothing is a little insulting, especially coming from someone I would have thought understood the company a bit more. Given that there are a grand total of ELEVEN people working here, I think we do an admirable job – Dark Horse has over 100 employees. IDW has something like 30. Could we be better at certain things? Certainly, but we do a lot for a small staff.

DAN: That is an impressive amount of work for 11 people...!  I had no idea.  I didn't mean any offense by my journal - I just thought the advertising was pretty limited and the policy was different.  Taking into account all the convention work and the means of solicitation - I stand corrected!  Thanks Eric!

ERIC: Not at all.  I love this business and all of this is very important to me.  Concerning the advertising aspect, though, I'm not sure where you want any of us – Image, IDW, Dark Horse – to advertise. Entertainment Weekly? TV? That isn't cost effective for Marvel and DC, why would it be for the rest of us?

DAN:  A man can dream, right?  I was thinking of targeting college campuses to start with.  I wouldn't imagine that would be as costly as huge magazines and national broadcast television.  Maybe some authorized Image Comics Panel discussions on campus that could lead to organized clubs or the present day equivalent of what a club might be on a college campus these days?  What do you think?  I'm sure that's not as simple as snapping your fingers and with the limited amount of resources available, etc... But maybe mentioning that Image Comics and some of it's creators would be up for some University Tours or something...

ERIC: I think that's an interesting idea, and you're right, it's not going to be as expensive as advertising. What's more, I have to think it would be a more direct method of engaging readers. Honestly, there are probably lots of things everyone could be doing beyond merely advertising in the usual places, and it's good to hear new ideas. I was reading something online recently, it may have been Skottie Young's blog or maybe it was Tony Harris, that said there's a lot of talk about how something needs to be done to broaden our readership, but very few ideas suggested about how to actually do that, so ideas like this and some of the others you brought up in your journal are a big help.

DAN:  Gotcha.  So what's one of the things most new creators don't pick up on when they're starting out?  Any pointers or suggestions?

ERIC:  The one thing most people don't seem to get is that the most successful books at Image are the ones that come out on time, by creators who are motivated to make their books successful. For every John Layman or Robert Kirkman, there is a creator content to just turn the book in, LATE, and then wonder why things didn't work out. I've seen it time and time again. There's a book right now – the first issue came out in January, great reviews, sold out. The second issue should be out now. Tumbleweeds. Probably going to be over a month late. That doesn't help on any level, and it's the main reason creator-owned books aren't supported by many retailers: They don't believe they're going to come out on time or, in some cases, ever.

DAN:  Thanks, Eric.  Mind if I share this on my next Journal?  I know you're super busy and you won't be able to field questions - but I think everyone would dig hearing your perspective.

ERIC:  Sure thing. More than happy set the record straight on all this stuff.

  • Mood: Llama
  • Listening to: Alt Nation on Sirius
  • Reading: Oscar Wilde
  • Watching: UFC
  • Playing: See Below
  • Eating: what I want when I want
  • Drinking: See Above